The Proclamation of 1763 – Issues and Reaction

King George’s Attempt to Deal With New Lands and Help the Indians

22 Comments
Join the Conversation
The Proclamation Restricted Westward Migration - National Atlas of the United States, 1775, at Wiki
The Proclamation Restricted Westward Migration - National Atlas of the United States, 1775, at Wiki
England, to respect Indian land rights and to govern lands newly acquired from France, issued the Proclamation of 1763. Colonists saw this as excessive control.

The Seven Years War (also called the French and Indian War) ended in early 1763. The Privy Council of the king recognized they had a problem. Indian nations in the lands ceded by France at the Treaty of Paris were friendly toward France and hostile to England and their many colonists. Also, England had no government in the new territories.

Issues Leading to the Proclamation of 1763

The Indians were hostile to England and the colonists because of the constant migration westward. Already by 1763 settlements extended to eastern Tennessee and Kentucky, on the west side if the Appalachian divide, and land speculators were making moves in the Ohio region. As more colonists crossed the ocean the pressure to occupy Indian lands would only increase. Preventing the colonists from moving west and from buying land from the native peoples was a possibility.

While the Privy Council was debating how to govern the new territories, what is now known as Pontiac’s Rebellion broke out in May 1763. The initial fighting was intense, with the Indian confederation taking eight English forts. The English knew they needed to issue orders to establish control of the frontier and regions beyond. This rebellion caused the king to move faster and perhaps farther than he otherwise would have.

Provisions of the Proclamation of 1763

So on October 7, 1763, King George III issued a proclamation. The goals of the Proclamation were to establish territorial government, placate the Indians, and reward those who fought in the recent war. This was accomplished by the following key provisions.

  • Establish four new territories and governments: Quebec, East Florida, West Florida, and Grenada. The latter covered territories in Caribbean islands. These territories were open to European settlement.
  • Establish an Indian reserve outside of the four new colonies and the original colonies, under English control.
  • Prohibit colonists from moving west of the ridge of the Appalachian Mountains.
  • Order white colonists already in the restricted territories to move east of the proclamation line, and to give up any land not properly purchased from the Indians.
  • Prohibit colonists from purchasing land from the Indians. Only the crown could purchase native land, and only if approached by the Indian nations.
  • Allow trade with the Indians, but only by those who were licensed by the colonial government to do so.
  • Provide land grants for officers, soldiers, and sailors who served in the recent war with France.

The king and his council did not intend for the proclamation line, beyond which were the restrictions on settlement and land purchase, to be a permanent line. The intention was to establish government and demonstrate to the native peoples that English intentions were not hostile. Keeping the restless colonists away for a time seemed a valid approach. Indeed, treaties between England and Indian tribes in 1768 and 1770 moved the line further westward. This allowed settlement of eastern Kentucky and Tennessee.

Reaction to the Proclamation of 1763

There was much dissatisfaction to the Proclamation, both in America and in England. The colonists did not like this restriction on where they could move and from whom they could buy land. The limits on trade were also distasteful. At this point in their history the colonies had begun to look upon control of their affairs by the king and Parliament as an infringement of their rights.

In England, land speculators did not like the inability to purchase land from the Indians or stake a claim, divide the land, and sell it to the colonists. A storm of protests occurred in both America and England over this aspect of the proclamation. It was seen as a backwards attempt by the crown to establish a monopoly on land purchase and distribution. It is no surprise that the king and his council had to make changes to the order and move the line westward. The land reserved for the Indian nations shrank with each alteration.

While the Proclamation failed to halt the relentless expansion of the colonists into the territories reserved for the Indians, it did have the effect of recognizing claims of the Indians to lands they had inhabited for generations. The Proclamation has been referenced in the adjudication of various native land claims for over two hundred years.

Source: , Vol. 2, page 84-87; Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 1968.

The Annals of America

David A. Todd, taken for my use

David A. Todd - David Todd is a civil engineer, a genealogist, a citizen concerned with the environment, and a writer by passion.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 6+9?
22 Comments

Comments

Dec 1, 2009 4:38 PM
Guest :
how did the colonists FEEL!
Dec 2, 2009 3:01 PM
David A. Todd :
As stated or implied in the article, the colonists were unhappy with the Proclamation of 1763. They saw it as a restriction by the king on a land that they had fought for and carved out of the wilderness.

Thank you for the comment.
Jan 11, 2010 4:18 PM
Guest :
helped with my school project alot
Jan 14, 2010 5:40 AM
Guest :
it might help with my newspaper article
Feb 28, 2010 1:39 PM
Guest :
whyd king DO IT!
Feb 28, 2010 2:16 PM
David A. Todd :
Guest @ Feb 28, 2010:

Why did the king issue the Proclamation? So far as I can tell, there were two main reasons:
1. All the newly conquered lands had to be administered. Some type of document and policy was needed, and
2. Ignorance. Ignorance of what America was like and what the colonists were like and would accept.

I think the king's heart was probably in the right place, but he did a lousey job of crafting an acceptable policy. Of course it was all his ministers and counsellors who did the crafting.
Mar 24, 2010 2:42 PM
Guest :
i think that it needed to be a little more clear on some specific aspects, but overall it told me what i needed to know.
Thank You so much!!!
Apr 27, 2010 4:49 AM
Guest :
why did the british feel it was necessary to stop the proclamation act
Jun 13, 2010 9:50 PM
Guest :
What does the American reaction to the proclamation tell us about the different ways Americans and Britons viewed the goals and reasons for the French and Indian War?
Jul 29, 2010 11:58 PM
Guest :
how did u get this information???
Jul 30, 2010 4:15 PM
David A. Todd :
Thanks to the last several guests who have commented.

@April 27: This appears to be one of the better things the King and Parliament did. They had just received much land from the war with France, and they needed to be able to administer it. So this was the method they proposed. I think they were also concerned about the Indians.

@June 13: An answer to that question would take another article by itself.

@July 29: The reference is in the article. In addition to that I read the actual proclamation.
Oct 21, 2010 6:43 PM
Guest :
HELPED WITH MY ESSAY A LITTLE
Nov 3, 2010 10:35 AM
Guest :
It's ok.... It gave me enough info. Sorta.
Nov 3, 2010 10:36 AM
Guest :
Help me with my homework.
Some, anyways.
Nov 21, 2010 10:27 PM
Guest :
I just need to know what King George did in 1763 That closed off the Lands west of the appalation mountains
Nov 29, 2010 9:34 AM
Guest :
i think we should all singggggg !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dec 1, 2010 12:50 PM
Guest :
i think it really helped but it could have gave my more information
Dec 16, 2010 5:11 PM
Guest :
This helped me to make a study guide for school, and it helped!! Aced the test
Jan 14, 2011 8:16 AM
Guest :
thanks it helps alot i needed the info for school, thanks!
Feb 10, 2011 6:56 AM
Guest :
i thought this aritcle didn't really talk about the colonists reaction to the law. It was still a pretty good article
Sep 15, 2011 1:10 PM
Guest :
what was the true reaction of the colonist
Sep 28, 2011 6:52 PM
Guest :
i dont understand it
22 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement